Governor Siminalayi Fubara’s move to reconstitute his cabinet, retaining eight commissioners while preparing a new nominees’ list, signals a strategic approach to governance in Rivers State following the expiration of the six-month emergency rule. This development, reported on October 13, 2025, warrants a balanced critique, weighing its merits and potential pitfalls.
On the positive side, it bears mentioning that Fubara’s decision to retain capable commissioners, such as Dr Adaeze Oreh, who has earned praise as an exemplary Health Commissioner, demonstrates a commitment to continuity and competence. Retaining experienced hands ensures stability in critical sectors like health, agriculture, and youth development, fostering trust in the administration’s ability to deliver on its mandates. The minor reshuffle, as hinted by a Government House source, could optimise performance by aligning portfolios with commissioners’ strengths, potentially enhancing governance efficiency.
Moreover, Fubara’s reconciliation with the Martin Amaewhule-led State House of Assembly and the inclusion of loyalists of FCT Minister Nyesom Wike in the new cabinet reflect political pragmatism. This inclusiveness could stabilise the state’s political landscape, which has been fraught with tensions. The peace deal brokered by Rivers elders underscores Fubara’s willingness to prioritise unity over division, a move that could unlock legislative cooperation and expedite developmental projects. The promise of “positive developments” in the coming weeks suggests a forward-looking agenda, potentially benefiting Rivers State’s citizens.
Also Read: Fubara Hails Tinubu for Posthumous Pardon of Ogoni 9, National Honours for Ogoni 4
However, this approach raises concerns. The retention of only eight commissioners and the dissolution of the broader cabinet may disrupt ongoing initiatives, creating a governance gap until new nominees are screened and confirmed. The lack of a clear timeline for this process, with the source vaguely stating it will happen “very soon,” risks prolonging uncertainty. Additionally, accommodating Wike’s loyalists, while politically expedient, could compromise Fubara’s autonomy. Critics may argue that this risks entrenching external influence, potentially undermining the governor’s authority as the state’s elected leader.
Furthermore, the reshuffle’s success hinges on the competence of new nominees and the effectiveness of the Assembly’s screening process. If poorly managed, it could lead to appointments driven by political patronage rather than merit, eroding public confidence. The anonymity of the source also raises questions about transparency, as official communication would better assure stakeholders of the governor’s intentions.
In conclusion, Fubara’s cabinet reconstitution is a calculated step toward stability and inclusivity, leveraging experienced commissioners and political reconciliation. However, its success depends on swift action, transparent processes, and prioritising merit over political expediency. While the move holds promise for Rivers State’s progress, it must be executed with precision to avoid governance disruptions and maintain public trust.
