Nigerian social media influencer and controversial crossdresser, Okuneye Idris Olanrewaju, popularly known as Bobrisky, has faced a significant legal setback. The Federal High Court in Lagos, presided over by Justice Alexander Owoeye, dismissed Bobrisky’s ₦200 million lawsuit against the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC).
Bobrisky had filed a fundamental rights suit against the EFCC, accusing the agency of violating his rights through harassment, threats of arrest, and defamation. As part of his claims, he sought ₦200 million in damages and an order to permanently restrain the EFCC from further actions that could infringe on his personal freedoms.
However, in a ruling delivered on Thursday, November 28, 2024, Justice Owoeye struck out the case, stating that Bobrisky failed to provide credible evidence to support his allegations of rights violations. The court found the claims baseless and without merit, dismissing them in their entirety.
In his petition, Bobrisky had sought:
- A declaration that the EFCC’s actions against him constituted a violation of his fundamental rights.
-
A perpetual injunction restraining the EFCC and its agents from harassing, arresting, or detaining him.
- Monetary compensation of ₦200 million as damages for alleged emotional and reputational harm.
Bobrisky alleged that the EFCC’s actions, including publicized threats and accusations, had not only tarnished his image but also violated his constitutional right to dignity and freedom.
Justice Owoeye’s ruling emphasized the importance of credible evidence in substantiating claims of rights violations. The judge stated that Bobrisky’s arguments lacked sufficient proof to justify the reliefs sought, effectively absolving the EFCC of any wrongdoing.
The court also highlighted that Bobrisky’s claims of harassment and infringement were speculative and unsupported by concrete evidence. Consequently, the case was dismissed, leaving the EFCC free to continue its investigations and actions without judicial restrictions.
During the trial, Bobrisky inadvertently confirmed his gender while addressing the charges of naira abuse brought against him. This clarification has sparked further discussions about his legal identity, particularly in cases where gender might influence legal interpretations or proceedings.
The dismissal of the case underscores the need for strong legal grounds when pursuing fundamental rights claims, particularly against powerful institutions like the EFCC. Bobrisky’s loss has been met with mixed reactions, with critics viewing the suit as an attempt to evade accountability, while supporters argue it highlights broader concerns about rights violations in Nigeria.
This ruling is a significant moment in Bobrisky’s controversial public life, adding another chapter to his legal battles and media presence. For the EFCC, it reinforces their authority to act within the bounds of the law, even in cases involving high-profile individuals.
As debates over fundamental rights and institutional power continue in Nigeria, this case serves as a reminder of the judiciary’s role in balancing personal freedoms with the enforcement of justice. Whether Bobrisky will appeal the ruling or explore alternative legal avenues remains to be seen, but the outcome has certainly added to the ongoing discourse surrounding his persona and legal entanglements.
