Company drags Minister of Transportation, AGF to court over breach of contract

The Minister of Transportation, Rotimi Amaechi and the Attorney General of the Federation (AGF), Abubakar Malami have been before the Abuja division of a Federal High Court over alleged unlawful award of 190 Km Rail Line construction to a Chinese Firm without due process of law.

In a suit marked FHC/ABJ/CS/1426/2021, the Minister and AGF were sued along with the Federal Ministry of Transportation and the benefitting firm, China Civil Engineering Construction Company, CCECC, Daily Sun reports.

The suit was filed by Duluidas Nigeria Limited, Duliz Dredging and Construction Limited and Consortium of Duluidas Nigeria Limited, Duliz Dredging and Construction Limited/Hebbelyixin Fastener Company Limited, China.

In the suit filed by their counsel, James Okoh, the plaintiffs asked the Court to cancel the letter of “No Objection” issued by the Bureau of Public Procurement (BPP) in favour of CCECC for the award of the N91.5Bn Rail Line Contract in breach of procurement laws and re-issue same in their favour.

It was gathered that the disputed contract valued at N91.5Billion, is for the reconstruction of a narrow gauge track from Minna in Niger State to Baro, with extension to the Baro River Port estimated to be completed within a period of 36 months.

The plaintiffs also prayed the court for an injunction restraining all the defendants from awarding or purporting to award the contract to the Chinese firm or any third party on the basis of the flawed bidding process.

In the alternative, they sought an order setting aside any purported award on the basis of the flawed and heavily compromised bid process by the Nigeria Railway Corporation (NRC) with concurrence of other defendants, while asking for an order restraining the Minister of Transportation or any of his agents from presenting the CCECC to the Federal Executive Council (FEC) for the purpose of award of the contract.

They also prayed the court to set aside any purported approval received from the FEC awarding the disputed contract to any other company during the pendency of the suit.

Plaintiffs who claimed to have quoted a lesser amount of N76.7billion naira for execution of the same project during their successful bidding are alleging bias against them by the Minister and undue favourisms in favour of the CCECC in the contract award.

In their statement of claim, plaintiffs claimed to be seasoned and experienced experts in the rehabilitation of rail lines and had executed 2211 KM Zaria to Kaduna Rail Line reconstruction for the federal government.

They asserted that by a letter of February 16, 2021, the federal government approved a list of companies including them as qualified to participate in the bidding process for the award of the contract.

After a private tender, the NRC on February 23, 2021 invited them to submit a financial bid for the job and that that they emerged successful along with other companies.

Plaintiffs alleged that the Minister on May 19,2021 wrote the BPP for a Certificate of No objection in favour of CCECC in the sum of N91, 580, 101, 710 and that by a letter of June 9, 2021, BPP rejected the Minister’s request on the claim that such Certificate can only be issued to them on the basis of their quotation of N76.7B to execute the job.

They asserted that along the line, other bidding processes were manipulated and compromised leading to receipt of acceptance letter by NRC from CCECC for the Minister to be presented to the Federal Executive Council FEC for the purpose of award of the contract.

The plaintiffs, therefore, prayed the court to make declaration that the action of the Minister and his agents in interfering with due process of the bid process for the contract damaged the integrity of the process of law.

They also want the court to declare that the Minister and his agents were biased in their assessment of the bidding in favour of the CCECC.

Plaintiffs applied for order of injunction against the Minister, his Ministry and the CCECC from continuing with the award of the contract and execution of same on the basis of flawed process.

In the alternative, they sought general damages to be quantified against the defendants on compensatory basis and compound interest for loss of use of money.Meanwhile, hearing in the matter has been fixed for February 17, 2022 by Justice Ahmed Ramat Mohammed.